Have A Question? Search This Site:
During a DUI traffic stop, officers may use several tools to assess whether a driver is impaired. One of these tools is the preliminary breath test, often referred to as a PBT. While it may resemble the breath tests people associate with formal DUI charges, its role is more limited and occurs earlier in the encounter. Understanding how PBTs function helps explain how officers move from initial suspicion to potential arrest within the mechanics of DUI laws.
Preliminary breath tests are part of the investigative phase of a traffic stop, not the charging phase. They are designed to provide officers with quick, on-scene information that can support or contradict other observations. The results do not stand alone, and they are not treated the same way as post-arrest testing. Instead, they fit into a broader process that evaluates multiple factors before an arrest decision is made.
What a Preliminary Breath Test Is
A preliminary breath test is a handheld device used at the roadside to estimate the presence of alcohol in a driver’s system. It is typically administered before any arrest occurs and is intended to give officers a general indication rather than a precise measurement. The device analyzes a breath sample and produces a numerical reading or qualitative result.
Unlike laboratory-grade equipment, PBT devices are designed for speed and portability. Officers can use them quickly during a traffic stop without transporting the driver elsewhere. Because of this, they are considered screening tools rather than definitive testing instruments.
The purpose of a PBT is not to establish guilt or to generate admissible evidence for trial in most situations. Instead, it helps officers decide whether further action is warranted. This distinction is critical. The test provides context but does not, by itself, determine whether a driver has violated DUI laws.
PBTs are commonly used after initial observations suggest possible impairment. These observations may include driving behavior, physical cues, or responses during questioning. The test result is then considered alongside those observations rather than replacing them.
How PBT Results Are Used During Traffic Stops
During a traffic stop, PBT results are used as one piece of information within an evolving assessment. Officers do not rely on the device alone. Instead, they consider whether the result aligns with what they have already observed.
If a PBT reading indicates the presence of alcohol, it may reinforce earlier observations that suggested impairment. For example, if an officer noticed slurred speech or difficulty following instructions, a positive PBT result can help confirm that alcohol is a contributing factor. Conversely, a low or negative result may prompt the officer to reconsider whether alcohol impairment is present or whether another explanation exists.
Importantly, PBT results are not treated as conclusive proof. Officers are trained to recognize that these devices have limitations and can be affected by factors such as device calibration, environmental conditions, or improper use. As a result, PBTs are used to inform judgment, not replace it.
The timing of the test also matters. PBTs are administered during the investigative phase, before any formal custody decision. Their role is to help officers decide whether there is sufficient cause to proceed with an arrest or whether the stop should conclude without further action.
How PBTs Differ From Evidentiary Breath Tests
Preliminary breath tests differ significantly from evidentiary breath tests, even though both involve analyzing breath samples. The most important difference lies in their purpose and legal role.
Evidentiary breath tests are conducted after an arrest decision has been made. These tests use more sophisticated equipment designed to produce accurate, reliable measurements that can be used in formal proceedings. They are typically administered at a station or testing facility and follow standardized procedures.
By contrast, PBTs are informal screening tools. They are not designed to meet the same evidentiary standards and are often not used as direct proof of a specific alcohol concentration. Their primary value lies in helping officers assess whether probable cause exists at the roadside.
Another key difference is how results are documented. Evidentiary test results are carefully recorded and preserved, while PBT results are usually summarized in reports as part of the officer’s observations. The emphasis is on how the result influenced the officer’s decision-making rather than on the precise number produced.
Understanding this distinction helps clarify why PBTs influence arrests without determining outcomes on their own. They contribute to the process but do not replace the more formal testing that may follow.
When PBT Results Support an Arrest Decision
PBT results support an arrest decision when they align with other indicators of impairment observed during the stop. Officers look for consistency across multiple factors rather than relying on any single piece of evidence.
For example, an officer may observe erratic driving, note physical signs associated with alcohol use, and receive a PBT result indicating alcohol presence. Together, these elements can form a reasonable basis for concluding that impairment exists. The PBT helps confirm that alcohol is likely involved, strengthening the overall assessment.
However, a PBT result alone is not enough. Officers must still articulate how all observations fit together. If other indicators are weak or inconsistent, a PBT result may carry less weight in the decision-making process.
In some situations, PBT results may prompt officers to gather additional information before deciding. This could include further observation or questioning to ensure that the conclusion is supported by a complete picture. The test does not force an outcome; it guides the next steps.
Ultimately, PBTs support arrest decisions by adding clarity during the investigative phase. They help officers decide whether the situation warrants moving from investigation to custody based on the totality of circumstances.
Summary
Preliminary breath tests play a limited but important role during DUI traffic stops. They provide officers with quick, on-scene information that helps shape the investigation without serving as final proof of impairment. When combined with driving behavior, physical observations, and contextual factors, PBT results can influence whether an arrest occurs as part of the sequence of observations that lead to DUI arrests.
Understanding how PBTs fit into the process helps clarify common misconceptions. They are not definitive tests, nor are they irrelevant. Instead, they function as one component within a broader assessment that guides officers from initial suspicion to arrest decisions.